1 resultado para clinical assessment tools
em Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (5)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (22)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (95)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (17)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (8)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (105)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (66)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (193)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (84)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (5)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (9)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (9)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (22)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (23)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (6)
Resumo:
Background: The recent development of semi-automated techniques for staining and analyzing flow cytometry samples has presented new challenges. Quality control and quality assessment are critical when developing new high throughput technologies and their associated information services. Our experience suggests that significant bottlenecks remain in the development of high throughput flow cytometry methods for data analysis and display. Especially, data quality control and quality assessment are crucial steps in processing and analyzing high throughput flow cytometry data. Methods: We propose a variety of graphical exploratory data analytic tools for exploring ungated flow cytometry data. We have implemented a number of specialized functions and methods in the Bioconductor package rflowcyt. We demonstrate the use of these approaches by investigating two independent sets of high throughput flow cytometry data. Results: We found that graphical representations can reveal substantial non-biological differences in samples. Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function and summary scatterplots were especially useful in the rapid identification of problems not identified by manual review. Conclusions: Graphical exploratory data analytic tools are quick and useful means of assessing data quality. We propose that the described visualizations should be used as quality assessment tools and where possible, be used for quality control.